Peer Mediated Instruction and Intervention
This style of PMII is characterized by its structural change during the learning session. In all of these alternative teaching techniques, the students are assigned to a small group of students that they work with for part of the lesson. During the remainder of the time, the teacher lectures or they work in different groups. Therefore, during a learning session, the organization of the learning environment changes.
- Jigsaw was developed by Aronson and his colleagues in 1978 (as cited in Maheady et al., 1991), students are placed into three- to six-member heterogeneous learning groups. Each member of the group becomes an "expert" on a section of the lesson. The students are told to read their sections, and then meet in "expert groups" with other group members that read the same section. They discuss the material, identify the most important learning points, and return to their original groups to instruct team members about information in which they become "expert". Group members are responsible to learn all content from one another.
- Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) is a combination of cooperative learning and individualized instruction. Students are placed in an individual sequence of the learning material based on test performance. They proceed at their own pace, but their team checks daily practice sheets. Students earn points for their respective teams by passing final tests, completing multiple units, and handing in assignments. Students take their final unit tests individually (Slavin, Leavey, Madden, 1986 as cited in Maheady, Harper & Malette, 1991).
- Simple Structures: Kagan (1992) developed over 14 cooperative classroom structures, as opposed to traditional competitive structures. He has argued that competitive classroom structures set students against one another, whereas cooperative structures organize more positive social interactions among students. Some examples are:
- Numbered Heads Together (NHT): The teacher breaks the students into heterogeneous groups of one high achieving, two average, and one low-achieving student, and gives the students numbers 1-4. Then, the teacher lectures in the traditional format, and asks questions. The students turn to their group, and discuss the question so that every group member knows the answer. The teacher calls out a number, and only the team members with that number can raise their hand to answer the question. The goal of NHT is for all students to learn by working together, cooperatively. In addition, the social structure of the groups fosters heterogeneous friendships (Kagan, 1992).
- Co-op Co-op: This structure has two levels to it: team learning and mini-topic learning. The order of tasks the students complete include: 1) Student-centered class discussion, 2) selection of heterogeneous student teams, 3) team building and skill development, 4) team topic selection, 5) mini-topic selection (experts), 6) mini-topic preparation, 7) mini-topic presentation, 8) preparation of team presentations, 9) team presentations, 10) reflection and evaluation. Co-op Co-op assumes that children are curious and want to learn, thus, it allows the children to be creative and teach others what they discover. Presently, there is little research to substantiate Kagan’s Simple Structures, but it is believed that the structure could produce substantial benefits (1998).